Opinion
22-6547
10-18-2022
JAMES F. EASON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAYMOND BAILEY; KIRBY SANDERSON; GEORGE W. BAYSDEN, JR.; ALLEN DAVIS; JEFFREY POPE; MONICA BOND, Defendants - Appellees.
James F. Eason, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 13, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03273-D)
James F. Eason, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
James F. Eason appeals the district court's orders granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel discovery, denying his renewed motion to compel discovery, and granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment in Eason's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.[*]We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Eason v. Bailey, No. 5:18-ct-03273-D E.D. N.C. (May 21, 2020; July 24, 2020; Mar. 8, 2021; Mar. 1, 2022). We deny Eason's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
[*] Because the district court failed to address Eason's due process claim in its initial order granting summary judgment to Defendants, this court dismissed a prior appeal of that order for lack of jurisdiction and remanded to the district court for consideration of the unresolved claim. See Eason v. Bailey, 857 Fed.Appx. 753, 754 (4th Cir. 2021) (No. 21-6456).