From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earvase v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 29, 2015
116 A.3d 1243 (Del. 2015)

Opinion

No. 161, 2015.

06-29-2015

Matthew EARVASE, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


ORDER

JAMES T. VAUGHN JR., Justice.

This 29th day of June 2015, it appears to the Court that, on June 4, 2015, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant, Matthew Earvase, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for Earvase's failure to (i) file the opening brief and (ii) pay the Supreme Court filing fee in the absence of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Earvase has failed to respond to the notice to show cause and has neither filed the opening brief nor paid the filing fee. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Earvase v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 29, 2015
116 A.3d 1243 (Del. 2015)
Case details for

Earvase v. State

Case Details

Full title:Matthew EARVASE, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Jun 29, 2015

Citations

116 A.3d 1243 (Del. 2015)