From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earthbank Co., Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Summary

In Earthbank Co. v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 250 (1st Dept. 1991), the court found that the owner's failure to obtain a wetlands permit necessary to begin construction was a fundamental breach of contract.

Summary of this case from Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. Supply Co.

Opinion

April 11, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.).


This is an action for delay damages. The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract on June 4, 1982 in which plaintiff was to construct a football/soccer field at Ferry Point Park in the Bronx. A portion of the contract required the plaintiff to excavate the entire site, level the bottom area and then refill it. Because part of the site contained a wetlands area, a permit from the state was required before excavation was commenced. Plaintiff, however, commenced the excavation without a permit, and was ordered to cease excavation of the area and to refill the area until a permit was obtained. The resulting delay in completing the project and the resulting damages are the basis of this lawsuit.

The contract contained a provision obligating plaintiff to obtain "all required permits." Plaintiff's arguments that the defendant City was obligated to obtain a Wetlands permit, that the City did ultimately obtain it, and that the time requirements of the contract could not have been met if it had the obligation to obtain said permit are unavailing in light of the plain words of the contract.

Moreover, the contract contained a provision that there would be no damages for delays. While delay damages may still be recovered even though a no-damage-for-delay clause is contained in the contract when there is a breach by the City "of a fundamental, affirmative obligation", such obligation must be express and not implied. (Corinno Civetta Constr. Corp. v. City of New York, 67 N.Y.2d 297, 313.) The plaintiff's contention that the City's failure to obtain a Wetlands permit constituted an implied breach of a fundamental obligation of the contract does not meet the test of Corinno Civetta.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Earthbank Co., Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

In Earthbank Co. v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 250 (1st Dept. 1991), the court found that the owner's failure to obtain a wetlands permit necessary to begin construction was a fundamental breach of contract.

Summary of this case from Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. Supply Co.

In Earthbank Co. v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 250 (1st Dept. 1991), the court found that the owner's failure to obtain a wetlands permit necessary to begin construction was a fundamental breach of contract.

Summary of this case from Mafco Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Turner Constr. Co.
Case details for

Earthbank Co., Inc. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:EARTHBANK CO., INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 101

Citing Cases

Premier-New York v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Corp.

Because the exculpatory clause is specifically designed to protect the contractee from claims for delay…

Metro. Steel Indus. v. Perini Corp.

Because the exculpatory clause is specifically designed to protect the contractee from claims for delay…