From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earp v. Cnty. of Tulare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-00196-MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-00196-MJS

10-31-2011

DONNY Y. EARP, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT HENRY, and DOES 1-25, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, LeBEAU-THELEN, LLP By: KEVIN E. THELEN Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE and STEVEN HENRY BOURDETTE AND PARTNERS By: PHILIP BOURDETTE Attorneys for Plaintiff DONNY Y. EARP


Dennis R. Thelen, SBN 83999

Kevin E. Thelen, SBN 252665

LEBEAU • THELEN, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF TULARE and

STEVEN HENRY (erroneously sued herein as

"PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT HENRY")

JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES; ORDER

Magistrate: Michael J. Seng

The parties to the above referenced action, subject to the Court's approval, hereby stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS the parties desire to continue expert discovery related dates contained within the Court's July 1, 2011 Scheduling Conference Order;

WHEREAS the parties have been diligent in conducting discovery, however the plaintiff's status as an incarcerated individual has frustrated efforts at timely fact discovery which will be necessary for expert witness review in addition to counsel for defendants' multiple trial commitments in the past two months as well as anticipated in the following two months;

The parties HEREBY AGREE, subject to the Court's approval, to modify the fact discovery and expert discovery related dates contained in the Court's Scheduling Conference Order dated July 1, 2011 as follows:

1. Initial expert witness disclosure for both the plaintiff and defendants, previously set for November 15, 2011, shall be continued to December 16, 2011

2. Supplemental expert witness disclosure, previously set for December 15, 2011, shall be continued to January 16, 2012.

The parties also HEREBY AGREE, subject to the Court's approval, that the following dates, contained in the Court's Scheduling Conference Order dated July 1, 2011 remain as follows:

1. The cut-off for expert discovery shall remain February 1, 2012
2. The cut-off for fact discovery shall remain February 1, 2012
3. The deadline for filing dispositive motions shall remain February 1, 2012
4. The deadline for filing non-dispositive motions shall remain February 1, 2012
5. The Pre-Trial Conference shall remain June 1, 2012
6. The trial date shall remain June 26, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

LeBEAU-THELEN, LLP

By: KEVIN E. THELEN

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF

TULARE and STEVEN HENRY

BOURDETTE AND PARTNERS

By: PHILIP BOURDETTE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DONNY Y. EARP

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Earp v. Cnty. of Tulare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-00196-MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Earp v. Cnty. of Tulare

Case Details

Full title:DONNY Y. EARP, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT HENRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-00196-MJS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)