From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earley v. Officer Martinez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2023
3:22-cv-00040-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00040-ART-CLB

01-06-2023

MARC ANTHONY EARLEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MARTINEZ, et al, Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General, ANDREW C. NELSON, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants MARC ANTHONY EARLEY Plaintiff in pro se


AARON D. FORD Attorney General, ANDREW C. NELSON, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

MARC ANTHONY EARLEY Plaintiff in pro se

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Anne R. Traum, United States District Court Judge

Defendants, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and Andrew C. Nelson, Deputy Attorney General, and Plaintiff Marc Anthony Earley, pro se, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1), that the above-captioned matter should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court.

This Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice is executed as part of an out-of-court settlement between the Parties. Pursuant to the Parties' Settlement Agreement and Full and Final Release, each party hereto shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Earley v. Officer Martinez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2023
3:22-cv-00040-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Earley v. Officer Martinez

Case Details

Full title:MARC ANTHONY EARLEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MARTINEZ, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 6, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00040-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2023)