From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earle v. Pref. Pump

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
May 13, 2010
No. 06-09-00109-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2010)

Opinion

No. 06-09-00109-CV

Date Submitted: May 12, 2010.

Date Decided: May 13, 2010.

On Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court, Wood County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2006-469.

Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Clay Earle, individually, and Lake Fork Drilling, Inc., d/b/a Clay Earle Water Well Drilling, filed their notice of appeal December 1, 2009.

The clerk's record was filed March 30, 2010. The reporter's record was due to be filed on or before March 1, 2010, and has not been filed. When no reporter's record had been filed by April 19, 2010, we contacted the appellants (whose attorney was permitted to withdraw from representation March 30, 2010, after providing requisite notice) by letter and informed them that, if we did not receive information that appellants were making a substantial and tangible effort to prosecute the appeal by showing, within ten days of the date of the letter, either a reasonable attempt to obtain the reporter's record or by filing a brief based solely on the clerk's record, the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We have received no communication from the appellants. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Earle v. Pref. Pump

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
May 13, 2010
No. 06-09-00109-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Earle v. Pref. Pump

Case Details

Full title:CLAY EARLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND LAKE FORK DRILLING, INC., D/B/A CLAY EARLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana

Date published: May 13, 2010

Citations

No. 06-09-00109-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2010)