From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earle v. Paramo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 2, 2021
CV 18-5279-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

CV 18-5279-JAK (AGR)

06-02-2021

ERIC ALLEN EARLE, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No. objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on the merits and dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Earle v. Paramo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 2, 2021
CV 18-5279-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Earle v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ALLEN EARLE, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

CV 18-5279-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)