From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earl v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 17, 2021
17 CIVIL 8814 (NSR) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 8814 (NSR) (JCM)

03-17-2021

CHRISTOPHER EARL, Petitioner, v. HAROLD GRAHAM, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 16, 2021, the Court adopts MJ McCarthy's R & R in its entirety. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore DENIED. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005); Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir. 1997), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 225, 259-60 (2d Cir. 1997). The Court certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

March 17, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Earl v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 17, 2021
17 CIVIL 8814 (NSR) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Earl v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER EARL, Petitioner, v. HAROLD GRAHAM, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 17, 2021

Citations

17 CIVIL 8814 (NSR) (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)