From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaglet Corp. Ltd. v. Banco Cent. de Nicaragua

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 27, 1994
23 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 1672, Docket 94-7043.

Argued April 26, 1994.

Decided April 27, 1994.

John R. Foster, New York City (Waesche, Sheinbaum O'Regan, P.C., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant Eaglet Corp. Ltd.

George Weisz, New York City (Chaya F. Weinberg-Brodt, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Banco Cent. de Nicaragua.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before: FEINBERG, VAN GRAAFEILAND and WINTER, Circuit Judges.


We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua, 839 F. Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). However, because the dismissal of the complaint was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, both parties agree that the dismissal must be without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41; see generally Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 284-88, 81 S.Ct. 534, 544-46, 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961).


Summaries of

Eaglet Corp. Ltd. v. Banco Cent. de Nicaragua

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 27, 1994
23 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Eaglet Corp. Ltd. v. Banco Cent. de Nicaragua

Case Details

Full title:EAGLET CORPORATION LIMITED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BANCO CENTRAL DE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 27, 1994

Citations

23 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hensley

Section 846 is governed by U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, and § 859 is governed by the somewhat harsher § 2D1.2. Because…

Corzo v. Banco Central de Reserva del Peru

In addition, the Eighth and Seventh Circuits, as well as several district courts, have held that a waiver of…