Eagle v. Sletten

Full title: MARK DAVID BLACK EAGLE, Plaintiff, v. ERIK SLETTEN, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2019

CV 17-167-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Jun. 3, 2019)

Opinion

CV 17-167-BLG-SPW

06-03-2019

MARK DAVID BLACK EAGLE, Plaintiff, v. ERIK SLETTEN, Defendant.

SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on May 3, 2019. (Doc. 19). The Magistrate recommended the Court dismiss the complaint without prejudice and deny all motions as moot. (Doc. 19 at 3).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.

IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice and all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED this 3^rd day of June, 2019.

/s/_________

SUSAN P. WATTERS

United States District Judge