From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 27, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50772 (N.Y. App. Term 2012)

Opinion

04-27-2012

Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. as Assignee of EDDIE BARRINGTON, Appellant, v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Respondent.


PRESENT: : , P.J., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Margaret A. Pui Yee Chan, J.), entered September 22, 2008. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims in the sums of $1,013.25, $549.18 and $844.13.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims in the sums of $1,013.25, $549.18 and $844.13.

The branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims in the sums of $1,013.25, $549.18 and $844.13 were granted due to the failure of plaintiff's assignor to appear for examinations under oath (EUOs). On appeal, plaintiff contends that these branches of defendant's motion should have been denied because defendant never proved that the applicable automobile insurance policy contained a provision entitling defendant to EUOs. This argument lacks merit (see Mega Supplies Billing, Inc. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 33 Misc 3d 136[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52023[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]; Dover Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 28 Misc 3d 140[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51605[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2010]; Eagle Chiropractic, P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 19 Misc 3d 129[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 50525[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008]).

Plaintiff's remaining contention is not properly before this court since it is raised for the first time on appeal.

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Rios and Aliotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 27, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50772 (N.Y. App. Term 2012)
Case details for

Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. as Assignee of EDDIE BARRINGTON, Appellant, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50772 (N.Y. App. Term 2012)