holding that for purposes of determining coverage under insurance policy, "disease `results' . . . when it becomes reasonably capable of medical diagnosis"
Summary of this case from Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning CorporationNo. 82-1097.
March 7, 1983.
C.A. 1st Cir. Motion of Insurance Company of North America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision.
holding that for purposes of determining coverage under insurance policy, "disease `results' . . . when it becomes reasonably capable of medical diagnosis"
Summary of this case from Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corporationinterpreting Massachusetts law in asbestos exposure situation, holding that "each occurrence is made up of two components, the exposure and the resulting bodily injury; and it is the resulting bodily injury, not the exposure, which must take place 'during the policy period'"
Summary of this case from A.W. Chesterton Co. v. Mass. Insurers Insolvency FundFull title:EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 7, 1983
As the First Circuit pointed out in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Foremost-McKesson, Inc., 751 F.2d 475,…
Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co."See, e.g., Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 523 F.Supp. 110 (D.Mass. 1981), modified, 682…