From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle Indus., Inc. v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 6, 2019
2019-1242 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2019)

Opinion

2019-1242

11-06-2019

EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant v. MINIATURE PRECISION COMPONENTS, INC., Appellee

JACOB DANIEL KOERING, Miller, Canfield, Paddock, & Stone, PLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTHONY MICHAEL PALIZZI, Detroit, MI. JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRYAN JOSEPH SCHOMER, Troy, MI.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01403.

JUDGMENT

JACOB DANIEL KOERING, Miller, Canfield, Paddock, & Stone, PLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTHONY MICHAEL PALIZZI, Detroit, MI. JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRYAN JOSEPH SCHOMER, Troy, MI. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 6, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Eagle Indus., Inc. v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 6, 2019
2019-1242 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Eagle Indus., Inc. v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant v. MINIATURE PRECISION COMPONENTS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 6, 2019

Citations

2019-1242 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2019)