From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagans v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jul 19, 2022
No. 01-21-00420-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2022)

Opinion

01-21-00420-CR

07-19-2022

Larry Darnell Eagans v. State of Texas


184th District Court of Harris County, Trial court case number: 1614756

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Peter Kelly Judge

The appellate record in this case indicates that the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal does not comport with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it may be defective. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(D), 25.2(F), 34.5(C)(2); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 44.02; see also Jones v. State, 488 S.W.3d 801, 804-05 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (a certification that is correct in form but inaccurate when compared to the record is defective). The record contains two, identical signed certifications. Each of the trial court's certifications, both signed on January 6, 2021, state that the defendant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(A)(2). Our review of the clerk's record indicates that the certifications may be defective. This order constitutes notice to all parties of the apparent defective certification of the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1.

The certification appears to be inconsistent with the judgment adjudicating guilt signed on December 3, 2020. While the appellant waived his right to appeal in the underlying plea bargain that led to his deferred adjudication, the record does not reflect that he entered a guilty plea in the subsequent adjudication proceedings. When a defendant enters into a plea bargain for deferred adjudication community supervision, the plea bargain is complete at the time he enters his plea of guilty in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. Guerrero v. State, 554 S.W.3d 268, 272 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, no pet.) (citing Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)); see TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(A)(2). “[W]hen the defendant appeals from the proceeding on the motion to adjudicate guilt, Rule 25.2(a)(2) will not restrict appeal . . . .” Hargesheimer, 182 S.W.3d at 913. When a plea bargain does not relate to the subsequent adjudication hearing, the trial court is required to certify after the adjudication hearing that the case is not a plea bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal. Id.; Guerrero, 554 S.W.3d at 272.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require this Court to dismiss an appeal unless the record contains a written certification showing that the appellant has the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(D). The rules also permit amendment of a defective certification and prohibit this Court from dismissing an appeal based on the lack of a valid certification when we determine that an appellant has a right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(F), 34.5(C)(2), 37.1, 44.4; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we withdraw this appeal from submission, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. The trial court is ordered to conduct a hearing within 30 days at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney's Office and appellant's counsel must be present.

We order the trial court to:

1) make a finding whether the defendant has the right to appeal under Tex. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2);
2) if necessary, execute an amended certification of appellant's right to appeal;
3) make any other findings, conclusions, and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate; and
4) enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as to these issues, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f), 34.5(a)(12), (c)(2), 37.1.

The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record containing the amended certification of appellant's right to appeal, if any, and any other findings, recommendations, and orders of the trial court with this Court no later than 45 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2). The court reporter is directed to file the reporter's record of the hearing within 55 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court's active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court's active docket when the supplemental clerk's record is filed with the Clerk of this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eagans v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jul 19, 2022
No. 01-21-00420-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Eagans v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry Darnell Eagans v. State of Texas

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Jul 19, 2022

Citations

No. 01-21-00420-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2022)