From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eads v. Merendino

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 7, 2024
Civil 22-5571 (RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

Civil 22-5571 (RMB)

02-07-2024

CHRISTOPHER J. EADS, Petitioner v. WARDEN MERENDINO, Respondent


OPINION

RENEE MARIE BUMB CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Christopher J. Eads, whose last known address is FCI Fairton in Fairton, New Jersey, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on or around September 15, 2022. (Pet., ECF No. 1.) A search of Petitioner's records indicates that Petitioner transferred to another facility. However, Petitioner has not advised the Court of his new address.

I. DISCUSSION

Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) provides, in relevant part:

unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their . . . address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk. Failure to file a notice of change may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.

Dismissing a matter without prejudice is an appropriate remedy for noncompliance with this rule. See Archie v. Dept. of Corr., Civ. No. 12-2466 (RBK/JS), 2015 WL 333299, at *1 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2015) (collecting cases).

II. CONCLUSION

The Court will dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 10.1. An appropriate order follows.


Summaries of

Eads v. Merendino

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 7, 2024
Civil 22-5571 (RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Eads v. Merendino

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER J. EADS, Petitioner v. WARDEN MERENDINO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

Civil 22-5571 (RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 7, 2024)