Opinion
No. 05-06-01283-CR.
Opinion Filed February 29, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 401-80820-04.
Before Justices MOSELEY, BRIDGES, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Joseph Henry Eade, III waived a jury and pleaded guilty to injury to a child. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.04(a)(3) (Vernon Supp. 2007). Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for ten years, and a $1000 fine. The State later moved to revoke appellant's community supervision, alleging appellant violated the terms of his community supervision. The trial court found the allegations true, revoked appellant's community supervision, and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.