From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaddy v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2012
No. 10-7538 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-7538

02-21-2012

JOSEPH D. EADDY, Petitioner v. MRS. D. SAUERS, et al. Respondents


CIVIL ACTION

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Commonwealth's Response, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Petitioner's objections, I HEREBY ORDER as follows:

1. Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Petitioner's Objections to Judge Sitarski's Report and Recommendation merely restate the issues which Petitioner presented in his habeas petition. As Judge Sitarski's Report and Recommendation correctly and comprehensively addressed the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presented in Petitioner's habeas petition, I conclude that Petitioner's objections are overruled.

, JR., J.


Summaries of

Eaddy v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 21, 2012
No. 10-7538 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Eaddy v. Sauers

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. EADDY, Petitioner v. MRS. D. SAUERS, et al. Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2012

Citations

No. 10-7538 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2012)