Opinion
Case No: 2:14-cv-646-FtM-29CM
04-17-2015
E-VENTURES WORLDWIDE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on review of plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) filed on November 4, 2014. The Complaint incorporates by reference all of the allegations from each Count into each subsequent count. (Doc. #1, ¶¶ 50, 62, 69.)
"The typical shotgun complaint contains several counts, each one incorporating by reference the allegations of its predecessors, leading to a situation where most of the counts (i.e., all but the first) contain irrelevant factual allegations and legal conclusions." Strategic Income Fund, L.L.C. v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Corp., 305 F.3d 1293, 1295 (11th Cir. 2002). The Eleventh Circuit has consistently frowned upon shotgun pleadings such as the one presented herein, and shotgun pleadings "exact an intolerable toll on the trial court's docket." Cramer v. Florida, 117 F.3d 1258, 1263 (11th Cir. 1997). See also Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol., 516 F.3d 955, 979 n.54 (11th Cir. 2008) (collecting cases). Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit has established that when faced with a shotgun pleading, a district court should require the parties to file an amended pleading rather than allow such a case to proceed to trial. Byrne v. Nezhat, 261 F.3d 1075, 1130 (11th Cir. 2001). Therefore, dismissal of plaintiff's Verified Complaint is warranted.
Furthermore, plaintiff has requested leave to amend in order to provide additional factual allegations relevant to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. #42, p. 6.) Plaintiff may do so at this time.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed without prejudice to filing an Amended Complaint within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of this Order.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #36) is DENIED as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 17th day of April, 2015.
/s/_________
JOHN E. STEELE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: Counsel of record