From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mitchell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 30, 2017
58 N.Y.S.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-30-2017

E–UNIT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, et al., respondents, v. Lewis SAUL, et al., appellants.

Judd Burstein, P.C., New York, NY, for appellants.


Judd Burstein, P.C., New York, NY, for appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carolyn E. Demarest, J.), dated June 17, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was to impose sanctions.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendants' contentions, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of their cross motion which was to impose a monetary sanction upon the plaintiffs and their attorney, as the defendants failed to demonstrate that either engaged in frivolous conduct within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130–1.1(c) (see Finkelman v. SBRE, LLC, 71 A.D.3d 1081, 1082, 896 N.Y.S.2d 897 ; Glenn v. Annunziata, 53 A.D.3d 565, 566, 861 N.Y.S.2d 769 ).

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mitchell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 30, 2017
58 N.Y.S.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael MITCHELL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

58 N.Y.S.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)