From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E S Agency v. Ratcliff Welding

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 22, 1992
609 So. 2d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-587.

December 22, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; Sandra Taylor, Judge.

John M. Camillo and Douglas de Almeida, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Feldman Koenig and Timothy J. Koenig, Key West, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


The question in this appeal from an order granting a motion for directed verdict is whether the plaintiff presented any legal evidence on the factual issue, as to the existence of a contract of insurance, under principles of law applicable to the subject matter. Hilkmeyer v. Latin Am. Air Cargo Expediters, Inc., 94 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1957). The admissible evidence, which included testimony, admissions, and documents, was more than adequate to survive the motion. See Insurance Co. of Pa. v. Genova Express Lines, Inc., 605 So.2d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (parol evidence admissible to prove the contents of a contract). Particularly, the Renewal of Contract document, executed by the parties, establishes to a near certainty that there was a contract in existence to be renewed.

In this nonjury trial the motion should have been one for involuntary dismissal pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b). The same principles of law apply. Sea Tower Apartments, Inc. v. Century Nat'l Bank, 406 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.


Summaries of

E S Agency v. Ratcliff Welding

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 22, 1992
609 So. 2d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

E S Agency v. Ratcliff Welding

Case Details

Full title:E S AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT, v. RATCLIFF WELDING FABRICATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 22, 1992

Citations

609 So. 2d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)