From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 917 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Submitted October 29, 1926 —

Decided January 31, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 469.

For the respondent, Charles Jones.

For the appellant, Jerome T. Congleton.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 917 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark

Case Details

Full title:E. M. LAND COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1927

Citations

135 A. 917 (N.J. 1927)
135 A. 917
135 A. 916

Citing Cases

Hendlin v. Fairmount Construction Co.

" In the case of E. M. Land Co. v. Newark, 4 N.J. Misc. 467, not officially reported ( Sup. Ct. 1926), a…