Opinion
No. 3117 Docket No. NN-4311/22 Case No. 2023-06630
11-26-2024
In the Matter of E. L., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Justin L., Respondent-Appellant.
Steven P. Forbes, Huntington (Steven P. Forbes of counsel), for appellant. Muriel Goode-Trufant, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Josh Liebman of counsel), for respondent. Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
Steven P. Forbes, Huntington (Steven P. Forbes of counsel), for appellant.
Muriel Goode-Trufant, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Josh Liebman of counsel), for respondent.
Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
Before: Renwick, P.J., Moulton, Friedman, Kapnick, Kennedy, JJ.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Anna R. Lewis, J.), entered on or about November 13, 2023, which found, after a fact-finding hearing, that respondent father neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence established that the father, by committing domestic violence against the child's mother on May 31, 2022, posed an imminent danger to the then seven-month-old child's physical, mental or emotional well-being (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i]; Matter of J.A.W. [Lance W.], 216 A.D.3d 480, 481 [1st Dept 2023]). Although the father contends that Family Court erred in concluding that the mother's testimony was more credible than his, there exists no basis to disturb the court's evaluation of the evidence, including its credibility findings (see Matter of Y.H. [Mohamed H.], 219 A.D.3d 1247, 1248 [1st Dept 2023]; Matter of Ilene M., 19 A.D.3d 106, 106-107 [1st Dept 2005]).
Contrary to the father's contention, the evidence shows that the child's emotional and mental conditions were impaired or in imminent danger of being impaired by her exposure to the domestic violence he perpetrated against the mother. The mother's testimony establishes that the child was on her lap when the father punched the mother in the jaw, notwithstanding the absence of evidence that the child was aware of the incident or emotionally affected by it (see Matter of Athena M. [Manuel M.T.], 190 A.D.3d 644, 644 [1st Dept 2021]; Matter of Isabella S. [Robert T.], 154 A.D.3d 606, 607 [1st Dept 2017]).
The father's argument concerning petitioner's purported failure to have the maternal grandmother testify at the fact-finding hearing is unpreserved and unavailing. The father never sought a missing witness charge during the fact-finding hearing, and there is no evidence that the grandmother witnessed the incident (see Matter of Ethan M. [Miguel M.], 223 A.D.3d 471, 471-472 [1st Dept 2024]).