From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dzik v. State

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02113-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02113-GMN-EJY

04-04-2023

MITCHELL DZIK, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DENYING MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND CLOSING CASE

GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The court directed pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petitioner Mitchel Dzik to, within 30 days, either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a completed and signed financial certificate and the required inmate account statements in order to complete his application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) That order was served on Dzik at his address of record. More than the allotted time has passed, and Dzik has not paid the fee, filed the required financial documentation, or contacted the court in any manner. The court thus denies the incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dzik was also expressly advised that failure to comply with the court's order would result in the dismissal of the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this court's order to pay the filing fee or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Dzik also filed what he styled as an emergency motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 3.) But he simply asks the court to grant his petition and order his release. As the petition is dismissed without prejudice, the motion is denied as moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court detach and file the petition (ECF No. 1-1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set forth in this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's emergency motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment accordingly and close this case.


Summaries of

Dzik v. State

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02113-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Dzik v. State

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL DZIK, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 4, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02113-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)