Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-370
09-10-2012
KEVIN DYSON, Petitioner v. WILLIAM A. SCISM, Respondent
(Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion (Doc. 10), recommending that the petition for habeas corpus (Doc. 1) be denied, and, following an independent review of the record and noting that petitioner filed objections to the report on April 25, 2012 (Doc. 11), and the court finding Judge Mannion's analysis to be thorough and well-reasoned, and the court finding petitioner's objections to be without merit and squarely addressed by Judge Mannion's report (Doc. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that:
Where objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation are filed, the court must perform a de novo review of the contested portions of the report. Supinski v. United Parcel Serv., Civ. A. No. 06-0793, 2009 WL 113796, at *3 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2009) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n. 3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c)). "In this regard, Local Rule of Court 72.3 requires 'written objections which . . . specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings, recommendations or report to which objection is made and the basis for those objections.'" Id. (citing Shields v. Astrue, Civ. A. No. 07-417, 2008 WL 4186951, at *6 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 8, 2008)).
1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mannion (Doc. 10) are ADOPTED.
2. The petition for habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner's request for a subpoena (Doc. 8) is DENIED as moot.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
_______________
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
United States District Judge