From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dyson v. Pittman

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Aug 16, 2022
Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-192-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-192-TFM-B

08-16-2022

ERIANE DYSON, Petitioner, v. ERICO PITTMAN Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TERRY F. MOORER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 15, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended this action be remanded due to a lack of federal jurisdiction. See Doc. 3. No objections were filed.

Therefore, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte ORDERS that this action is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Summit County, Ohio, for want of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to effectuate the remand and to close this action.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dyson v. Pittman

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Aug 16, 2022
Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-192-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Dyson v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:ERIANE DYSON, Petitioner, v. ERICO PITTMAN Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-192-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)