From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dysart v. Madigan

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Dec 19, 2005
Case No. 05-2156 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 05-2156.

December 19, 2005


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation (#21) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on November 30, 2005. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Young's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (#7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted with regard to Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment claim and denied as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim.

(2) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Dysart v. Madigan

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Dec 19, 2005
Case No. 05-2156 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2005)
Case details for

Dysart v. Madigan

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DYSART, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MADIGAN, JAMES YOUNG, and NURSE JANE…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: Dec 19, 2005

Citations

Case No. 05-2156 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2005)