From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dysart v. Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 16, 2015
No. 4:15CV01221 ERW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:15CV01221 ERW

10-16-2015

PATRICIA J. DYSART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC., F/K/A LUZENACK AMERICA INC. Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND

This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand. [ECF No. 48] Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4:15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs' motion to remand in this case should be and will be granted.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for remand [ECF No. 48] is granted, and this case is remanded to the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice to being refiled in state court. Dated this 16th Day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

E. RICHARD WEBBER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dysart v. Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 16, 2015
No. 4:15CV01221 ERW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Dysart v. Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA J. DYSART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 16, 2015

Citations

No. 4:15CV01221 ERW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2015)