From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dynamotive, L.L.C. v. Robert Bosch Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2008
No. 07-14245 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-14245.

October 2, 2008


ORDER


For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on October 2, 2008, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [Docket #32] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

As to Interrogatory #1 of Plaintiff's First and Second Set of Interrogatories, the motion is GRANTED, as set forth on the record.

As to Interrogatories #2 and #3 of First and Second Set of Interrogatories and First Document Request #11, the motion is DENIED.

As to Interrogatory #6 of First Set of Interrogatories, the motion is GRANTED, as set forth on the record.

As to Interrogatory #7 of First Set of Interrogatories, the motion is GRANTED, as set forth on the record.

As to First Document Request #s 2, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 10, the motion is GRANTED, as set forth on the record.

As to Second Document Request #s 8 through 12, the motion is GRANTED, as set forth on the record.

As to electronically stored information, Plaintiff's counsel shall meet and confer with Defendant's counsel in a good-faith effort to facilitate the efficient production of the documents. Where so indicated on the record, responses may be limited to the GMT 900 series.

All non-electronically stored information covered by this Order will be produced within 21 days of the date of this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dynamotive, L.L.C. v. Robert Bosch Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 2, 2008
No. 07-14245 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Dynamotive, L.L.C. v. Robert Bosch Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DYNAMOTIVE, L.L.C. and DYNAMOTIVE IP, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT BOSCH…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

No. 07-14245 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2, 2008)