From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dyke v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
NO. CV-08-3120-JLQ (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CV-08-3120-JLQ.

November 1, 2010


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;


In a motion filed October 28, 2010, Plaintiff requests an additional 45-days to respond to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment due to limitations imposed by a prison mandate restricting prisoners' use of the law library. The court will allow Plaintiff the requested additional time until December 30, 2010 to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is warned, however, that any request for additional time is unlikely to be granted as the extension herein granted is generous. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Ct. Rec. 52) is GRANTED.

The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide a copy to Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants.

DATED this 29th day of October 2010.


Summaries of

Dyke v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
NO. CV-08-3120-JLQ (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Dyke v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY VAN DYKE, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

NO. CV-08-3120-JLQ (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)