See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 ( 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). See also OCGA § 16-7-1 (a); Dyer v. State, 298 Ga. App. 327, 329 (1) ( 680 SE2d 177) (2009). It is true that a conviction cannot be sustained solely based upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.
Furthermore, the determination of witness credibility is entirely within the province of the factfinder. See Dyer v. State, 298 Ga. App. 327, 329 (1) ( 680 SE2d 177) (2009). As previously stated, Mays's burglary convictions were supportable as a matter of law.
(Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Dyer v. State, 298 Ga. App. 327, 331 (3) ( 680 SE2d 177) (2009). (a) Officer Condit's description of Poper.
Dyer, supra, 298 Ga. App. at 330 (2). Dyer v. State, 298 Ga. App. 327, 329-330 (2) ( 680 SE2d 177) (2009).Cook v. State, 276 Ga. App. 803, 809 (6) ( 625 SE2d 83) (2005).
See Ansley v. State (hotel owner's testimony that defendant was soliciting prostitution would have been admissible to explain owner's conduct in giving defendant notice to leave the premises); Gasaway v. State (testimony that defendant was drunk and had been starting fights was relevant to explain why defendant had been forbidden to enter premises). Dyer v. State, 298 Ga. App. 327, 331 (3) ( 680 SE2d 177) (2009).Rayburn v. State, 250 Ga. 657 (2) ( 300 SE2d 499) (1983).