From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dye v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-CV-10183 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-CV-10183

07-02-2018

TIMOTHY DYE, 302488, Plaintiff, v. J. HATTON and L. GIDLEY, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT

This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiff's motion for a clerk's default and for a default judgment [docket entries 21 and 22]. Magistrate Judge Whalen has issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which he recommends that both motions be denied. Plaintiff has filed a pro forma objection but does not address the magistrate judge's reasoning, namely, that Congress has eliminated default as a remedy in prisoner cases. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g). Further, as the magistrate judge noted, defendants have recently responded to the complaint by filing a motion for summary judgment, thereby mooting the issue raised in plaintiff's motions for default. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Whalen's R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a clerk's default and for a default judgment [docket entries 21 and 22] are denied. Dated: July 2, 2018
Detroit, Michigan

s/Bernard A. Friedman

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on July 2, 2018.

s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager


Summaries of

Dye v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-CV-10183 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Dye v. Hatton

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DYE, 302488, Plaintiff, v. J. HATTON and L. GIDLEY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-CV-10183 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2018)

Citing Cases

ScOtt v. Commonwealth

Courts will typically overrule objections that “do[] not address the magistrate judge's reasoning.” See,…

Millhouse v. Seleshi

Moreover, this section has been interpreted to mean that an incarcerated plaintiff is not entitled to…