Opinion
SC: 155784 COA: 330308
12-27-2017
Matthew DYE, BY his Guardian, SIPORIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/ Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and Geico Indemnity Company, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/ Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Priority Health and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Defendants-Appellees.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the applications for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The plaintiff's application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is GRANTED in part, limited to the issue whether an owner or registrant of a motor vehicle involved in an accident may be entitled to personal protection insurance benefits for accidental bodily injury where no owner or registrant of the motor vehicle maintains security for payment of benefits under personal protection insurance. See MCL 500.3101(1) ; MCL 500.3113(b) ; Barnes v Farmers Ins Exch, 308 Mich App 1, 862 N.W.2d 681 (2014). The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1). The application for leave to appeal and GEICO Indemnity Company's application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.