From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dye v. Bernier

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-28

In the Matter of Shawn M. DYE, Respondent, v. Amanda L. BERNIER, Now Known as Amanda L. Bernier–Hucks, Appellant.

Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant. William L. Koslosky, Utica, attorney for the child.


Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant. William L. Koslosky, Utica, attorney for the child.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ.

McCARTHY, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Lambert, J.), entered February 2, 2012, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct. Act article 6, for custody of the parties' child.

In February 2012, Family Court granted petitioner's application for sole custody of the parties' child. Respondent appealed. Respondent subsequently filed a petition seeking custody. In November 2012, the court, upon the parties' consent, granted respondent sole custody. This subsequent order, which provides respondent with all the relief she seeks and supercedes the order being appealed, renders the appeal moot ( see Matter of Rolston v. Decker, 94 A.D.3d 1264, 1264, 941 N.Y.S.2d 895 [2012];Matter of Dickerson v. Knox, 89 A.D.3d 1290, 1291, 932 N.Y.S.2d 586 [2011];Matter of Stalker v. Stalker, 88 A.D.3d 1177, 1178, 932 N.Y.S.2d 202 [2011] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE and GARRY, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Dye v. Bernier

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Dye v. Bernier

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Shawn M. DYE, Respondent, v. Amanda L. BERNIER, Now Known…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2128
961 N.Y.S.2d 814

Citing Cases

Lehmann v. Edm Lenox, LLC

In the amended order, the motion court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for reargument on procedural…