Opinion
2:22-cv-01008-APG-VCF
10-18-2022
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK, Plaintiff v. TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al., Defendants
ORDER
ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 15, 2022, plaintiff Daniel Dydzak was advised by the court that his claim against Thomas Layton would be dismissed without prejudice unless by October 15, 2022 Dydzak either filed proper proof of service or showed good cause why such service was not timely made. ECF No. 63. Dydzak has failed to do so.
The notice also advised Dydzak that he failed to provide proof of service as to defendant Wallace Tashima. ECF No. 63. However, Tashima has appeared in this action. ECF No. 81.
I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff Daniel Dydzak's claim against defendant Thomas Layton is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely and properly serve.