Opinion
No. 390 MAL 2012
03-27-2013
JULIA Y. DYCKMAN, Petitioner v. DENNIS V. DYCKMAN, Respondent
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with the plain wording of section 3105 (c) of the divorce code, 23 Pa. §3105(c)?
(2) Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with a series of other decisions of the Superior Court, including Sorace v. Sorace, 440 Pa. Super. 75, 655 A.2d 125, 1995 Pa. Super. Lexis 275 (1995); Gaster v. Gaster, 1997 Pa. Super. Lexis 3706, 703 A.2d 513 (1997); McMahon v. McMahon, 4017 Pa. Super. 592, 612 A.2d 1360 (1992) (en banc); Peck v. Peck, 1998 Pa. Super. Lexis 172. 707 A.2d 1163 (1998) and Miller v. Miller, 2009 Pa. Super. 197, 983 A.2d 736, 2009 Pa. Super. Lexis 3765 (2009)?