Opinion
CASE NO. 1D16–4350
10-16-2017
DYCK–O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Angella MASSA & Joseph Massa, Appellees.
David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa; and Daniel C. Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant. Catrina H. Markwalter and J. Morgan Foster, Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellees.
David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa; and Daniel C. Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
Catrina H. Markwalter and J. Morgan Foster, Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck–O'Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck–O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court's decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.