Opinion
CASE NO. 1D16-4352
10-16-2017
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. DANELL A. HUTHSING, et al., Appellees.
David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa; Daniel C. Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa; and Scott Zimmer of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Riverview, for Appellant. Austin Tyler Brown, Parker & DuFresne, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Robert M. Dees, Judge. David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa; Daniel C. Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa; and Scott Zimmer of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Riverview, for Appellant. Austin Tyler Brown, Parker & DuFresne, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court's decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal). ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.