From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dwyer v. City of Chico

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
2:18-cv-01554-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01554-KJM-DMC

06-25-2021

Grace Dwyer, Plaintiff, v. City of Chico, Defendant.


ORDER

On June 25, 2021, the court held a scheduling conference via videoconference. Scheduling Conference Min. (June 25, 2021), ECF No. 46. Joseph Zink represented plaintiff. I Roger Colvin represented defendant. Id.

The court directed the parties to meet and confer following the hearing in light of defendant's plans to file a motion for summary judgment. Following the meet and confer, the parties are directed to inform the court whether they request a court-convened settlement conference with another judge of the court. The defense also agreed in effect to an earlier dispositive motion cutoff dat e, and is directed to file any motion for summary judgment within 45 days. Upon the court's resolution of summary judgment, it will reset the final pretrial conference.

The court also briefly reviewed with the parties plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, which the court denied in April 2021. Order (April 9, 2021), ECF No. 43. The court reminds the parties that while the court did not find the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment, the court did not make any findings of law or fact in that order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dwyer v. City of Chico

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
2:18-cv-01554-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Dwyer v. City of Chico

Case Details

Full title:Grace Dwyer, Plaintiff, v. City of Chico, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-01554-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)