From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duwayne C. v. Merced City Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 18, 2021
1:19-cv-01188-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01188-BAM

06-18-2021

DUWAYNE C., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem REGINA SCHINDLER, Plaintiff, v. MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AS MOOT (DOC. 68)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On May 20, 2021, Plaintiff submitted a Request to Seal Documents to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 141. (Doc. 68.) According to the Notice of Request to Seal Documents, Plaintiff seeks to submit the Contingency Retainer Agreement between Plaintiff and Liberty Law under seal to aid the Court in evaluating Plaintiff's petition for minor's compromise. (Id. at 2.)

The instant request is not necessary because the Contingency Retainer Agreement between Plaintiff and Liberty Law has already been filed under seal pursuant to Court order. (See Doc. 63, Order to Seal Documents.) Plaintiff is not required to re-submit or re-file the document. Accordingly, the pending request to seal documents is DENIED as moot. The Contingency Retainer Agreement will remain filed under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duwayne C. v. Merced City Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 18, 2021
1:19-cv-01188-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Duwayne C. v. Merced City Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:DUWAYNE C., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem REGINA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 18, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01188-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2021)