From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duverney v. Big Creek-Mentor Utility Authority

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 30, 2003
469 Mich. 984 (Mich. 2003)

Opinion

No. 123163.

December 30, 2003.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal.

No. 123163. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), the clerk is to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include, among the issues to be briefed, a discussion of (1) the minimal pleading requirements for an action claiming relief pursuant to the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, § 31, as construed by Bolt v. City of Lansing, 459 Mich 152 (1998), and (2) whether the complaint in this case meets those requirements. They may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order. The application for leave to appeal remains pending. Court of Appeals No. 243866.

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ. We would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Duverney v. Big Creek-Mentor Utility Authority

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 30, 2003
469 Mich. 984 (Mich. 2003)
Case details for

Duverney v. Big Creek-Mentor Utility Authority

Case Details

Full title:DUVERNEY v. BIG CREEK-MENTOR UTILITY AUTHORITY

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 30, 2003

Citations

469 Mich. 984 (Mich. 2003)
674 N.W.2d 153