From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duvall v. Honeywell Tech

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 23, 2008
282 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1304.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-03544-CWH).

Kathryn Duvall, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret League Boylston, Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth Detrick, PA, Hampton, South Carolina, Benjamin Phillip Glass, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kathryn Duvall appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on her defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Duvall v. Honeywell Tech. Solutions, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-03544-CWH, 2008 WL 350999 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 6, 2008; entered Feb. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although Duvall summarily requests an order redacting all of her personal information and work history from the court's records, as well as an order sealing the court's records, because she has not established she is entitled to this relief, we deny Duvall's requests.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Duvall v. Honeywell Tech

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 23, 2008
282 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Duvall v. Honeywell Tech

Case Details

Full title:Kathryn DUVALL, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 2008

Citations

282 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2008)