From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 3, 2021
264 A.3d 342 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1453 EDA 2020

09-03-2021

Patricia DUTY and Debra Miller, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Jennifer Wright Appellants v. TOYOTA ADVANCED LOGISTICS, Bastian Solutions, Peach State Integrated Technologies, Toyora Industrial Equipman Mfg. Inc., Raymond Corporation, Raymond-Muscatine, Inc., Lift, Inc., Pacific Rim Capital Inc., Alejandro Sachez Beltran, Hamilton Caster, Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Industries, Corp., Toyota Forklifts, Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Toyota Industries North America



Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 3, 2021
264 A.3d 342 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)
Case details for

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Case Details

Full title:Patricia DUTY and Debra Miller, Individually and as Administrators of the…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

264 A.3d 342 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)