From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duty v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 14, 1994
886 S.W.2d 875 (Ark. 1994)

Opinion

CR 94-1153

Opinion delivered November 14, 1994

Appeal error — motion for rule on the clerk — good cause for granting. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Robert C. Harder, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, James A. Duty, by his attorney, Robert C. Harder, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).


Summaries of

Duty v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 14, 1994
886 S.W.2d 875 (Ark. 1994)
Case details for

Duty v. State

Case Details

Full title:James A. DUTY v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 14, 1994

Citations

886 S.W.2d 875 (Ark. 1994)
886 S.W.2d 875