) In Baker v. Simpson, 613 F.3d 346 (2d Cir. 2010), the Second Circuit held that a debtor's legal malpractice claims were claims "arising in" title 11, as the claims would have no existence outside of the bankruptcy. The Third Circuit reached a similar finding in In re Seven Fields Development Corp., 505 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLC, 569 F.3d 485, 489 (D.C. Cir. 2009); In re V&M Mgmt., Inc., 321 F.3d 6, 7-8 (1st Cir. 2003); Lothian Cassidy LLC v. Ransom, 428 B.R. 555, 560 (E.D.N.Y. 2010); Galloway v. Bond, Botes & Stover, P.C., 597 F.Supp.2d 676, 682 (S.D. Miss. 2008); Dutt, LLC v. Huggins, No. 3:12-2036-CMC-PJG, 2012 WL 5384942, at *1 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2012); Meyer v. Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, No. 1:CV10-540-BLW, 2011 WL 1317282, at *1 (D.Idaho Mar. 31, 2011). The Court similarly finds that this malpractice action is a civil proceeding arising in a case under title 11, and is thus subject to this Court's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334(b).