From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dutra v. Eagleson

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Jan 26, 2007
No. B183033 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2007)

Opinion


Page 1485b

146 Cal.App.4th 1485b __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ DAVID DUTRA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DONALD EAGLESON, Defendant and Respondent. B183033 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight January 26, 2007

Alameda County Super. Ct. JCCP No. 4359; Super. Ct. No. HG03132860

THE COURT:good cause appearing, the opinion filed in the above entitled matter on December 27, 2006 (146 Cal.App.4th 216; __Cal. Rptr. 3d __), is modified as follows:

On page 8 [146 Cal.App.4th 224, advance report, 2d full par., lines 9, 10], line 20, through line 21, the phrase "third party defendant knew or should have laiown of a representative's sexual misconduct and took no steps to prevent it." is replaced with the following language: "third party defendant knew, had reasion to know, or was otherwise on notice of a representative's sexual misconduct and took no steps to prevent it."

On page 12 [146 Cal.App.4th 227, advance report, 2d full par., line 3], line 9 of DISCUSSION, section 4., which reads "party with actual or constructive knowledge that Eagleson's employee or agent engaged . . ." is replaced with the following language: "party who knew, had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice that Eagleson's employee or agent engaged . . . ."

No change in judgment.


Summaries of

Dutra v. Eagleson

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Jan 26, 2007
No. B183033 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Dutra v. Eagleson

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DUTRA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DONALD EAGLESON, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Jan 26, 2007

Citations

No. B183033 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2007)