From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dutchess Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jettris P. (In re Shaolin E.P.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-31

In the Matter of SHAOLIN E.P. (Anonymous).Dutchess County Department of Social Services, respondent;Jettris P. (Anonymous), appellant.

Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant. Ronna L. DeLoe, New Rochelle, N.Y., attorney for the child.


Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant. Ronna L. DeLoe, New Rochelle, N.Y., attorney for the child.

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated August 17, 2010, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence that the mother permanently neglected the subject child by failing, for more than one year after the child's placement with the Department of Social Services, to plan for the future of the child ( see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][c]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142–143, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Darrnell G. [ Robin Denise H.], 88 A.D.3d 789, 930 N.Y.S.2d 908; Matter of Peter C., Jr. [ Peter C.], 88 A.D.3d 702, 930 N.Y.S.2d 264; Matter of Jonathan B. [ Linda S.], 84 A.D.3d 1078, 1079, 923 N.Y.S.2d 638). The Family Court properly concluded that it was in the child's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights and free him for adoption by the foster parent ( see Family Ct. Act § 631). A suspended judgment was not appropriate in light of the mother's lack of insight into her problems and failure to address the primary issues which led to the child's removal in the first instance ( see Matter of Peter C., Jr. [ Peter C.], 88 A.D.3d 702, 930 N.Y.S.2d 264; Matter of Zechariah J. [ Valrick J.], 84 A.D.3d 1087, 1088–1089, 923 N.Y.S.2d 653).

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., FLORIO, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dutchess Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jettris P. (In re Shaolin E.P.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Dutchess Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jettris P. (In re Shaolin E.P.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHAOLIN E.P. (Anonymous).Dutchess County Department of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
937 N.Y.S.2d 598
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 789

Citing Cases

Orange Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jessica W. (In re Isabella R. W.)

The court may: (1) dismiss the petition if the allegations are not established; (2) suspend judgment for up…