From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durst v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 9, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00298-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2020)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00298-CR

11-09-2020

LEONARD EUGENE DURST, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.


On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa and Tijerina
Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record. Appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 9th day of November, 2020.


Summaries of

Durst v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 9, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00298-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Durst v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD EUGENE DURST, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Nov 9, 2020

Citations

NUMBER 13-20-00298-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2020)