From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durso v. Durso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1984
106 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 31, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.).


Judgment modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by increasing the child support for each child from $25 to $50 per week, and increasing the duration of maintenance from three years and one month to six years after the date of judgment. As so modified, judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to defendant, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County for a determination as to the amount of child support which has accrued.

We have modified the judgment because the record warrants an increase in the amount of child support and in the duration of the maintenance award. The parties were married for 20 years prior to separation. The defendant remained home full time until two years before the separation to care for the three children of the marriage, and there is a marked discrepancy between plaintiff husband's annual earnings of approximately $32,430 as a correction officer and defendant's annual earnings of $8,600.

As to child support, we note that the standard of living enjoyed by the children prior to dissolution of the marriage would be markedly reduced by the contribution therefor by plaintiff of only $25 per week per child (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B, subd 7, par a, cl [3]), and that the parochial school tuition for the youngest child was $1,500 a year (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B, subd 7, par a, cl [2]). Therefore, and in view of the great difference in income between the parties, plaintiff should be responsible for the greater portion of the children's needs. Thus, we increase the child support award to $50 a week per child.

As to the duration of the maintenance award, we increase it to six years. Until such time as she can earn a substantially higher income, the defendant's sustained efforts to educate herself so that she can become fully self supporting should not be a reason to limit the duration of the maintenance award. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Durso v. Durso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1984
106 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Durso v. Durso

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DURSO, Respondent, v. CATHERINE DURSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Mele v. Mele

The court also found a substantial disparity in income between the parties. It having been demonstrated that…

Lang v. Downey

The gross disparity in the parties' incomes (see, Matter of Sacco v Sacco, 69 A.D.2d 1004) and the changing…