From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duron v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00149-GSA (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00149-GSA

11-12-2021

REYNALDA DURON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff moves for an unopposed 60-day extension of time from November 19, 2021 to January 18, 2022 to file an opening brief. This is Plaintiff's second extension in this case, and first extension request for cause having previously used the 30-day extension provided by the scheduling order as of right.

The Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties. Doc. 5 at 3. Beyond the single extension by stipulation, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” Id.

When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party's diligence in seeking the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV-01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002).

Counsel seeks the extension due to an increased case load, year-end administrative duties at his firm, and pre-planned holiday travel. Counsel identified sufficient good cause for the extension and sought it reasonably in advance of the upcoming November 19 deadline. A 60-day extension seems a bit excessive, however, on the heels of the 30-day extension provided by the scheduling order. A 45-day extension will be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to file an opening brief is extended to and including January 3, 2022. All other deadlines are adjusted accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duron v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00149-GSA (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Duron v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:REYNALDA DURON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00149-GSA (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)