From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duron v. Adult and Family Services Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1985
710 P.2d 164 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

2-2002-AL9179-6; A34613

Argued and submitted December 13, 1985.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 26, 1985.

Judicial Review from Adult and Family Services Division.

Roberta J. Lindberg, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


The referee in this aid to dependent children case failed to make explicit findings as to petitioner's credibility. We are unable to review the referee's decision for substantial evidence without such a determination. See, e.g., Allen v. Employment Division, 73 Or. App. 426, 698 P.2d 1009 (1985); Ashmore v. Employment Division, 70 Or. App. 516, 690 P.2d 522 (1984).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Duron v. Adult and Family Services Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1985
710 P.2d 164 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Duron v. Adult and Family Services Division

Case Details

Full title:DURON, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 26, 1985

Citations

710 P.2d 164 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
710 P.2d 164